Zero attack and high level ?

... A place to ask for help on any topic whether it be starting out to player killing to IT issues.
Post Reply
Warrior

Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Warrior » Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:09 am

I've been curious how do you lvl 51 LS wars practice in combo, like examples pk setups? Also I've heard rumors of you get attack based on level is this true? Like at level 51 do you even need to prac attack? What percentage do you get if you don't do you think? Thanks!

Weir
Posts: 645
Joined: Sun Mar 22, 2015 12:44 am

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Weir » Sun Apr 16, 2017 1:19 am

I think the testing that was done showed at high level, unless you practice over something like 70 or 80%, you are better off not practicing it at all. However, once you practice it over that threshold, it will go off more noticeably than without it. So it really just depends on how much you want to use it. If you are going to frequently go berserk PKing, or smobbing, etc., I would practice it to 80%+. If it is going to be a rarity, you might be better off not sinking practices in it.

In combo, you probably won't be going berserk much, and can't necessarily afford the pracs in it either, so might be better off without attack entirely.

Mckale
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Mckale » Sun Apr 16, 2017 2:12 am

18 14 14 18 19
99 bash
99 lblades
95 sparry
89 notice
92 dodge
80 attack
7 ride/surv

In heavy combo gchains grings with brass hilted mounted I get like;
157 ob 87 db 141 pb wimpy

Parker
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 7:52 am

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Parker » Sun Apr 16, 2017 8:48 am

Looking at McKale you could also drop shield parry if you go two handed lblades, and id recommend only 6 ride. You will lose 1 ob and db for a ton of pracs elsewhere, on hunters I go back and forth on 6 and 7 ride for the 4th line of autotrack but thats not a concern on warrior. With those extra pracs personally I would get 50 minimum search for north pk, put 1 prac in rescue, get 86 track and put one more in notice to hit 92 as I hate using h., still not 100% to hit hidden but I rarely have issues. This is based on Mckale stats also so you may not be able to pull all that.

Eol
Posts: 733
Joined: Mon Aug 31, 2015 10:34 pm

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Eol » Sun Apr 16, 2017 12:03 pm

http://forums.wotmud.info/viewtopic.php?f=7 ... ack#p13421

See this thread for some testing values.

Mckale
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Mckale » Mon Apr 17, 2017 12:07 am

If you're pking blight, 6 ride isn't gonna cut it :p

Guest

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Guest » Mon Apr 17, 2017 2:14 am

So from chavaons tests by looks at 51 with setup I want and prac stats, getting 68 attack would be worth it compared to not pacing attack at all?

Parker
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 7:52 am

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Parker » Mon Apr 17, 2017 7:36 am

I had always heard that too Mckale, but then a top tier pker told me 7 ride was a waste, and he was talking on a hunter. I played around with it and I haven't noticed any difference in 6 and 7 in the blight, besides the earlier mentioned 1 ob and db and 4th line of auto track on hunter. Is there any proof that there is an advantage to 7 ride in blight? I didn't do any actual testing so would honestly like to know, I haven't "felt" a difference and have used 6 quite often and I really only north PK which means basically nothing but blight lately.

Mckale
Posts: 91
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 6:45 pm

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Mckale » Mon Apr 17, 2017 1:09 pm

Definitely a difference in terms of moves. I always die hagg misties or blight because of lvl 6 ride. I seem to "feel" a difference between the bash at least as well.

Parker
Posts: 22
Joined: Thu Apr 21, 2016 7:52 am

Re: Zero attack and high level ?

Post by Parker » Mon Apr 17, 2017 6:20 pm

As far as 68%, yes it seems worth it from reading the thread that was linked earlier.

Post Reply