Revamping the Warranting Rules
Posted: Tue Dec 06, 2016 7:01 pm
This has been brought up recently and Elysia expressed some interest in it being looked into. PLEASE keep things civil. Don't make references to IC or in-game issues. Use a hypothetical to outline a potential flaw in the rule(s); and don't just frame IC/in-game issues as a hypothetical. This thread is being made for the sole purpose of fixing the warranting rules, it is not being offered as a forum for people to air grievances.
Currently, the warranting rules are:
Currently, the warranting rules are:
1. You can warrant for any attack on your person anywhere in the mud, provided this doesn't breach any of the following rules.
2. You can warrant for any breaking of your nation's laws, provided these are in line with these rules.
3. You can warrant for witnessing a warrant being served on your clan's territory, provided this does not entail a wanted clanmate being hunted (this is in line with 4).
4. You cannot warrant for a player serving a warrant upon you.
5. You cannot warrant for a player assisting a fellow member of their clan when you are trying to serve a warrant upon the wanted.
6. You cannot warrant for clan affiliation or abilities, except for men who can channel.
7. If someone appeals a warrant you must a) post to the entire clan not to hunt that person due to an appeal and b) resolve it within seven (7) days or c) the clan Watcher will make the final binding ruling.
8. If someone submits and you accept the submission, you must pardon.
Players are expressly reminded that an appeal is not the same as a request for a pardon. As such, the time restrictions on requesting a pardon (and accompanying quest), do not apply.
You must warrant before attacking someone, except on the rare occasion that you can only save someone's life by attacking on the spot. In the same vein you can't use mobs to warrant for you.
pial wrote:Using banishment to banish someone for a month, or indefinitely, or whatever length of time is essentially not very different than warranting someone. I think that's a system that could be looked into for sure! The warranting rules don't apply to it so people use it as a defacto warrant.