Rodger wrote:I'm just going to say that even if you never hit him, attacking someone in a group means the others in that group can warrant you regardless of where it is...the rules about warranting were removed and it is back into player control...the very fact that you got immortals involved raises red flags.
Someone correct me if I'm wrong.
As per Vehruer's confirmation. You are completely wrong. A big part of the problem is players holding these beliefs based on their personal feelings and not what is enforceable or fair. And then what happens is staff have to tell you that you are in fact wrong, you spend days debating it and telling staff you think the rules are stupid. Then six months later the same thing happens and the clan/whoever claim they were never told/didn't know despite staff repeatedly telling them they can't do it. What it really boils down to is that certain players don't care for fairness or rules, they just align themselves with their OOC friends, prejudices and 'feelings'.Cosmo wrote:It took radically action by staff to overturn the decisions made by the players and even still those players feel they were righteous in their wrongdoings.
Just because you group with someone, it does not give them immunity in any other nation or wilderness that is not controlled by your own jurisdiction. Otherwise you're just trying to be 'world police'.
Overall I was merely trying to highlight that people don't have to be council to abuse their power for OOC reasons.